### The Hunt for Addi(c)tive Monster 2.

In the previous post, we were looking for

*a monster*—a nonlinear additive function. We found that such a function is extremely pathological: it is nowhere locally monotone, nowhere continuous and nowhere locally bounded. Worse than that, it's easy to prove that the graph of a monster is dense in , that is, for every*x*and*y*, an arbitrary neighborhood of*x*contains a point that monster sends arbitrarily close to*y*.Recall our attempt to construct a monster. Any additive function is linear on any -set and is fully determined on this set by a value it has in any single of its points. Our Direchlet function derived monster failed (or rather fell) because the slopes an additive function has on different -sets are not independent. Indeed, given that

*f*has a slope on a -set and a slope on a -set , it has to have a slope on a -set . This shows a way to construct a monster: one has to find a collection

*B*of real numbers such that (i) every real number can be represented as a sum , with rational coefficients of which only finite number is non-zero (so that the sum is defined) and (ii) that such representation is unique. Then one can select arbitrary values on elements of

*B*and take moster's value on to be , which is well-defined thanks to (ii).

Looks familiar? It should be: the definition of

*B*is exactly the definition of a basis of a vector space. Real numbers can be added to each other and multiplied by rationals and, therefore, form a vector space over . This space is very different from a usual one-dimensional vector space real numbers form over (

*i.e.*, over themselves).

After a streak of bad and unlikely properties that a monster has, we now got something positive: a monster exists if and only if as a vector space over has a basis. Does it?

But of course. Any vector space has a basis—this is a general theorem almost immediately following from the Zorn's lemma. The basis we are looking for even got a name of its own:

*Hamel basis*.

At last we stumbled across the whole family on monsters. Specifically, there exists a set and a function such that every real number r can be uniquely represented as

where only finite number of are non-zero for a given

*r*. From this it immediately follows that .

Take an arbitrary function , and define

that is,

*f*is additive. Intuitively, is a slope

*f*has at the -set .

*f*is linear if and only if is a constant function, in all other cases

*f*is a monster. If one takes , then

is an especially weird monster function: it takes only rational values!

Note that almost all additive functions are, after all, monsters—only very small sub-set of them is linear.

Hey, thanks for these, I was actually wondering how bad would such a function be and you cleared it up for me, nice one!

ReplyDeleteI have no idea how I stumbled onto this, but I'm glad I did. It's wonderful.

ReplyDelete